GEMI Announces Creation of “Building a Scope 3 Program, A GEMI Quick Guide”

WASHINGTON, June 3, 2024, The Global Environmental Management Initiative (GEMI), an organization that has for over 30 years provided a forum for cross-sector companies and associations to work collaboratively and effectively to address Environment, Health & Safety and Sustainability management solutions, announced today the development of Building a Scope 3 Program, A GEMI Quick Guide.”

“The decarbonization of business operations is a major focus of companies committed to environmental sustainability, and in order to meet objectives that have been set by responsible companies, you can’t meet those goals without addressing the carbon emissions of suppliers within our value chains,” said Becky Hensley, GEMI Co-Chair, and Senior Manager, Sustainability, CSX.  She continued: “This quick guide is intended as a guidance and solutions document, it is not prescriptive on what or how a company should address Scope 3 issues, but it outlines a Framework for a Scope 3 Program, addresses key governance issues, and empowers and supports companies, wherever they are in their sustainability journey.”

Brooke Wynn, GEMI Co-Chair, and Senior Director, Sustainability, Smithfield Foods, added, “The GEMI Scope 3 Quick Guide outlines a Nine Step process that can help companies create their own Scope 3 decarbonization program.”  She continued, “Addressing carbon reductions strategies within a company’s supply chain and value chain is hard work, but we recognize the importance of disclosing, reducing, and be transparent about carbon emissions.”  “This tool, and the insights, case studies and reference materials, including GEMI’s Scope 3 Engagement Matrix located in Appendix A, and Progress Through Action – Decarbonizing the Value Chain in Appendix B, recognize the important role that collaborations, both internal and external, play in a successful Scope 3 decarbonization strategies,” she added.

“I want to recognize and thank the members of GEMI’s Scope 3 Work Group that developed this GEMI Quick Guide, and the case studies, and to acknowledge and thank Natalie Pryde, Founder and CEO, PrydESGroup, for the expertise, leadership and guidance that she provided in the development of this new tool,” said Steve Hellem, Executive Director, GEMI.  He continued, “GEMI has always been an organization committed to EH&S and Environmental Sustainability leadership and supporting companies and organizations as they work collaboratively to develop and implement solutions to the challenges faced by our member companies and organizations. This new Quick Guide adds to the library of Tools and Quick Guides that have been developed since GEMI’s founding in 1992.”

xxxx

For over 30 years, GEMI has captured the vision and experience of corporate EH&S and environmental sustainability leaders through the development of a wide range of tools and deliverables designed to help companies improve the environment and provide business value. Present members of GEMI and its Work Groups include: American Chemistry Council; Bristow Group Inc.; ConocoPhillips; CSX; FedEx; FMI – The Food Industry Association; Gannett Fleming; Nexus Circular; Plastics Industry Association; SEE; SLB; Smithfield Foods; The Fertilizer Institute; Tyson Foods; Verdesian; and, Woodard & Curran.

For more information about GEMI please visit GEMI’s website at www.gemi.org

GEMI Publishes Quick Guide on Buyer / Supplier Collaboration on Sustainability

GEMI Quick Guide provides a short, easy-to-read view of how companies can engage with their suppliers in more collaborative ways to create shared value.

Washington, DC – The Global Environmental Management Initiative (GEMI), a global leader in developing insights, networking and creating collaborative sustainability solutions for business, today published a Quick Guide on Buyer / Suppliers Collaboration on Sustainability.

The Quick Guide builds on GEMI’s Responsible Supply Chain Guiding Principles, published in 2017, and is intended to offer a simple framework for advancing buyer/supplier engagement on sustainability.

The Quick Guide may be used to support discussion within an organization, and with its suppliers and customers, about how to achieve greater business value from deeper collaboration on sustainability issues and opportunities.

Short case examples have been included throughout the Quick Guide to highlight how thoughtful and strategic engagement can reduce the burden on suppliers and deliver improved sustainability performance for both buyers and suppliers.

“GEMI developed its Responsible Supply Chain Guiding Principles to provide a framework to help guide the process for engaging suppliers regarding sustainability, advancing strategic collaborations and, promoting increased alignment across industry-focused supply chain sustainability initiatives” said Bill Gill, AVP Environmental Affairs, Smithfield Foods and GEMI’s Chair.  “This new Quick Guide builds on that framework established through the Guiding Principles to provide additional context relating to engaging with suppliers along with real-world examples to help companies to put the Guiding Principles into action.”

“GEMI’s Supply Chain Sustainability Work Group sought input from a variety of leading companies, third party providers, and industry associations to inform development of both the Responsible Supply Chain Guiding Principles as well as this Quick Guide,” said Mark Johnson, Senior Vice President and Director of Environmental Compliance, Gannett Fleming and GEMI’s Vice-Chair. “We greatly appreciate all those organizations that have taken the time to engage with GEMI and share their perspectives to help inform our discussions on this important topic.”

GEMI would like to thank the 2017/2018 GEMI member companies and Supply Chain Sustainability Work Group participants for their leadership and engagement in GEMI’s supply chain sustainability efforts, including American Chemistry Council, American Cleaning Institute, American Forest & Paper Association, Ashland, Beverage Industry Environmental Roundtable, Carnival Corporation & PLC, Corn Refiners Association, Dell, Ecolab, ExxonMobil Chemical, FedEx Corporation, Gannett Fleming, Hexion, IPIECA, Merck, Perdue Farms, Plastics Industry Association, Procter & Gamble, Schlumberger, SealedAir, Smithfield Foods, Smith & Nephew, UL Environment, Valvoline, Waste Management.

GEMI would also like to recognize and thank those external organizations that provided input through GEMI Supply Chain Sustainability workshops in 2017 and 2018, including CDP, Ecodesk, EcoVadis, Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition, Electric Utility Industry Sustainable Supply Chain Alliance, Environmental Defense Fund, ISN, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Pharmaceutical Supply Chain Initiative, SupplyShift, Sustainable Purchasing Leadership Council, The Sustainability Consortium, The Coca-Cola Company and Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production.

Special thanks also to Mary Beth Jordan, MBJ Strategies and Kellen Mahoney, GEMI’s Program Manager for their work in supporting the creation of this Quick Guide.

The GEMI Quick Guide may be downloaded at: https://gemi.org/solutions/solutions-quick-guides/gemi-quick-guide-on-buyer-supplier-collaboration-on-sustainability/

About GEMI 
GEMI (www.gemi.org) is a global leader in developing insights, networking, and creating collaborative sustainability solutions for business. For 25 years, GEMI has captured the vision and experience of global corporate environmental, health and safety (EHS) and sustainability leaders from diverse business sectors through the development of a wide range of publicly-available, solutions-based tools designed to help companies improve the environment, their operations and add business value. 

Chains, levers and webs: supply chain sustainability’s strange mix

GEMI appreciated Scott Nadler sharing his insights on supply chain sustainability strategy at our supply chain sustainability workshop in June of last year, and wanted to share the following blog detailing Scott’s thoughts on this important subject. This article originally appeared on Nadler Strategy LLC.


I was drafted into the corporate environmental world.

One January morning over 25 years ago, I was called up to the executive floor at the railroad where I worked. The Chairman had realized we were 5 years behind our competitors and 10 years behind our customers and that we needed a corporate environmental program. I was it. I was pulled from my roles in marketing, development and real estate to create and run the corporate environmental program.  The Board of Directors was meeting in an hour to confirm my appointment. The only guidance I got was: “Go figure out what you do.”

Ruthlessly, I went out to track down industry leaders (especially from our big customers) and squeeze every bit of insight I could from them. At the time, those leaders were all involved with GEMI. I glommed onto them.

After their GEMI meetings, my new mentors often gathered at the bar to commiserate. They complained about regulators who told them what to do and what not to do, without understanding their business. They went off on NGOs who demanded lots of information without knowing what they would do with that information.

Once I timidly asked these wise men and women how they dealt with suppliers (especially since I was one). They all boasted of their supplier management programs: “We tell our suppliers clearly what they can and can’t do, and we demand a lot of information.”  They didn’t seem to appreciate the irony.

Fast-forward 25 years and a lot has changed – but maybe not enough. Companies like Nike, Walmart and P&G, and industries like electronics and apparel, have put in place major supplier programs that no one dreamed of back then. Emerging platforms like the US BCSD’s Materials Marketplace create innovative new customer-supplier relationships. [Disclosure: I serve as Program Director for US BCSD.] But then I participated in two meetings last year that plunged me deeply back into the world of supply chain sustainability.  Between GEMI’s Supply Chain Sustainability Workshop and US BCSD’s “Expanding the Circle” meeting with Ohio State University, I talked with dozens of companies and trade associations about this.

Concerned with what I saw, I checked in with a colleague who brings a very different perspective. His firm, Ibis Consulting, is based in Africa. [Disclosure: I am a Non-Executive Director at Ibis.]  He works with companies at the other end of the supply chain, as well as firms who have their own supply chains to worry about.

We agreed that there are three competing supply chain sustainability approaches now which can be summarized as:

  • Chains, not much different than 25 years ago, that limit action and impose a burden to be carried by suppliers;
  • Levers which are still linear but open the potential for two-way collaboration; and
  • Webs that recognize and utilize the non-linear nature of many commercial relationships.

We published our thoughts last week.  That article includes a quick test you can take to see if your program is made up of chains, levers or webs – if you’re brave enough.

[Opinions in this blog are solely those of Scott Nadler and do not necessarily represent views of Nadler Strategy’s clients or partners, or those cited in the post. To share this blog, see additional posts on Scott’s blog or subscribe please go to nadlerstrategy.com.]

Developing Common Principles for Supply Chain Sustainability

We have heard from many corporate sustainability leaders regarding the challenges they face in efficiently managing a wide variety of different expectations for addressing supply chain sustainability.

Many are seeking ways to better understand the sustainability performance of companies within their supply chain while responding to similar requests from their own customers.

While the overall objectives of such efforts are often similar, their format, content and value are typically quite different.

Earlier this year, we worked with the Global Environmental Management Initiative (GEMI)’s Supply Chain Sustainability Work Group to evaluate different supply chain sustainability principles established by various industry organizations (including industries such as aerospace, apparel, chemical, consumer goods, electronic, pharmaceutical, plastics and utility) and third-party organizations (such as CDP, Ecodesk, EcoVadis, Manufacture 2030, Sedex, Sustainable Purchasing Leadership Council, The Sustainability Consortium and others).

GEMI’s goal in this work was to develop a simple framework that companies and industry stakeholder groups can use to guide the process for engaging suppliers regarding sustainability, advance strategic collaborations and promote increased alignment across industry-focused supply chain sustainability initiatives.

GEMI workshop (2017)

To better understand which principles for evaluating supplier sustainability performance may be most relevant across industries, GEMI convened a workshop this past summer and facilitated engagement with a variety of companies, industry associations, and 3rd party providers. Through that workshop and various follow-up discussions, we began to identify a core set of common elements that business leaders across industries reported to be essential when engaging their suppliers on sustainability.

We’re excited to now share the following GEMI Responsible Supply Chain Guiding Principles which are a direct result of those conversations. We continue to see a proliferation of new and different expectations for supplier sustainability performance, and believe there is an opportunity to promote further coordination across efforts while enhancing focus on tangible results that drive long-term business value. Our hope is that these Guiding Principles will provide a useful framework for GEMI members and other organizations in furthering such efforts.

We’re looking forward to working with GEMI on the next phase of this work in 2018, and welcome your thoughts and ideas on the following Responsible Supply Chain Guiding Principles.

GEMI Responsible Supply Chain Guiding Principles

Accountability: The buyer/supplier relationship is a partnership and should be built on shared responsibility and commitment to exemplary/good practices.

Collaboration: Engagement with suppliers should focus on actionable outcomes, and be viewed as an opportunity to drive innovation and continuously improve the sustainability performance of both buyers and suppliers.

Commitment to Shared Value: It is important to clearly define the strategic purpose for engaging suppliers, while being mindful of culture and maturity, and seeking opportunities for mutual value creation throughout the process.

Inform Decision-Making: Information gathered through buyer/supplier engagements should inform business decision-making, and be utilized to reduce risk, differentiate, innovate and add value for all involved stakeholders.

Relevance: Customers and suppliers should identify those aspects of sustainability performance most relevant to both the buyer’s internal goals and objectives, and those most applicable to the supplier given its sector, size and location.

Scalability: For solutions to be scalable across global supply chains, it is important that they be aligned with existing systems/standards, and provide a usable framework that promotes sustainable outcomes. Opportunities to reduce duplication and increase shared value through mutual recognition of assessments and/or audits should be considered whenever possible.

Transparency: Buyer/Supplier relationships should be built on trust and require clear communication and education on sustainability expectations, including expectations around traceability of data, while maintaining confidential and proprietary business information


View this post from GEMI Program Manager Kellen Mahoney on LinkedIn.